Groups of order 2024

Happy new year!

Group theory warm-up exercise for the year: what are all the groups of order 2024?

Last year we did 2023, which was rather boring because all groups of order {2023} are abelian. This year the possibilities are much more numerous and the calculation is somewhat involved.

There are some easy initial reductions using Sylow’s theorem. Let {G} be a group of order {2024 = 2^3 \cdot 11 \cdot 23}. Sylow’s theorem implies that there must be a unique subgroup {P} of order {23}. Similarly, in the quotient {G/P} of order {2^3 \cdot 11} there must be a unique subgroup of order {11}. Therefore {G} has a unique subgroup {N} of order {11 \cdot 23}. Let {Q} be a Sylow {2}-subgroup of {G}. Then {G = NQ \cong N \rtimes_\alpha Q} for some homomorphism {\alpha : Q \to \mathrm{Aut}(N)}.

We can easily list the possibilities for {N} and {Q}. There are just two possibilities for {N}: the cyclic group {C_{253}} and the unique nonabelian semidirect product {C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}}. There are five possibilities for {Q}: {C_8}, {C_4 \times C_2}, {C_2^3}, the dihedral group {D_4}, and the quaternion group {Q_8}.

Next, for each choice of {N} and {Q}, we must consider all possibilities for {\alpha : Q \to \mathrm{Aut}(N)}. However, in order to avoid duplication, we must determine when two homomorphisms {\alpha, \beta : Q \to \mathrm{Aut}(N)} induce isomorphic semidirect products.

A quick word about notation. Following standard practice in group theory, we denote group actions on the right. If {x} and {y} are elements of a common group {G}, we denote by {x^y} the conjugate {y^{-1} x y}. We also denote by {x^\alpha} the image of {x} under a given homomorphism {\alpha}. We can then say that the semidirect product {N \rtimes_\alpha Q} is generated by copies of {N} and {Q} subject to the natural-looking relation

\displaystyle  n^q = n^{q^\alpha}.

This relation asserts that the conjugation action of {Q} on {N} is given by {\alpha}.

Suppose {f} is an isomorphism from {G_\alpha = N \rtimes_\alpha Q} to {G_\beta = N \rtimes_\beta Q} such that {f(N) = N}. Then {f} induces an automorphism {f_1} of {N} as well as an automorphism {f_2} of {G/N \cong Q}. These automorphisms are not arbitrary: they satisfy a certain compatibility relation. Namely, for all {n \in N} and {q \in Q} we have

\displaystyle  (n^{q^\alpha})^{f_1} = (n^q)^f = (n^f)^{q^f} = (n^{f_1})^{(q^{f_2})^\beta}.

In other words, for all {q \in Q} we have, in {\mathrm{Aut}(N)},

\displaystyle  f_1^{-1} q^\alpha f_1 = (q^{f_2})^\beta.

Written a third way, we have, as elements of {\mathrm{Hom}(Q, \mathrm{Aut}(N))},

\displaystyle  \alpha f_1^\iota = f_2 \beta,

where {f_1^\iota} denotes the inner automorphism of {\mathrm{Aut}(N)} induced by {f_1}. (Alternatively, if somewhat more traditionally we denote function composition in a right-to-left manner, the compatibility relation is {f_1 \cdot \alpha \cdot f_1^{-1} = \beta \circ f_2}.)

Let us denote by {I_{\alpha,\beta}} the set of all isomorphisms {G_\alpha \to G_\beta} such that {f(N) = N}, and by {C_{\alpha, \beta}} the set of all compatible isomorphism pairs {(f_1, f_2) \in \mathrm{Aut}(N) \times \mathrm{Aut}(Q)}, i.e.,

\displaystyle  C_{\alpha,\beta} = \{(f_1, f_2) \in \mathrm{Aut}(N) \times \mathrm{Aut}(Q) : \alpha f_1^\iota = f_2 \beta\}.

The import of the previous paragraph is that there is a natural map {I_{\alpha,\beta} \to C_{\alpha,\beta}}. Moreover this map is surjective (though typically not injective), because if {(f_1, f_2)} is a compatible isomorphism pair then the map {f :G_\alpha \to G_\beta} defined by {(nq)^f = n^{f_1} q^{f_2}} is an isomorphism (easy exercise). In particular, there is an isomorphism {f} from {N \rtimes_\alpha Q} to {N \rtimes_\beta Q} such that {f(N) = N} if and only if {C_{\alpha,\beta} \ne \emptyset}, i.e., if and only if there is a pair of compatible automorphisms {(f_1, f_2) \in \mathrm{Aut}(N) \times \mathrm{Aut}(Q)}.

We can phrase this conclusion another way. Observe that {\mathrm{Aut}(N) \times \mathrm{Aut}(Q)} acts naturally on {\mathrm{Hom}(Q, \mathrm{Aut}(N))}. The {\mathrm{Aut}(Q)} factor acts by precomposition, while the {\mathrm{Aut}(N)} factor acts by conjugation. Isomorphism classes of split extensions {N \rtimes Q} are in bijection with orbits of {\mathrm{Aut}(N) \times \mathrm{Aut}(Q)} in {\mathrm{Hom}(Q, \mathrm{Aut}(N))}. (Here we consider {N \rtimes_\alpha Q} and {N \rtimes_\beta Q} to be isomorphic as extensions if and only if there is an isomorphism {f : N \rtimes_\alpha Q \to N \rtimes_\beta Q} such that {f(N) = N}. In general this is more restrictive than mere isomorphism as groups.)

Now consider the special case in which {\alpha = \beta}. In this case {I_{\alpha,\alpha}} is a subgroup of {\mathrm{Aut}(N \rtimes_\alpha Q)} and {C_{\alpha,\alpha}} is a subgroup of {\mathrm{Aut}(N) \times \mathrm{Aut}(Q)}, and the natural map {I_{\alpha,\alpha} \to C_{\alpha,\alpha}} is a homomorphism. Let {K} be the kernel. Then {K} consists of all isomorphism {f : G \to G} that restrict to the identity on {N} and induce the identity on {G/N \cong Q}. This implies that there is a map {h : Q \to N} such that {q^f = q q^h} for all {q \in Q}. Since {f} restricts to the identity on {N}, we have

\displaystyle  n^q = (n^q)^f = n^{q^f} = n^{q q^h},

which implies that {h} takes values in the centre {Z(N)} of {N}. Moreover, {q^f = qq^h} is a homomorphism {Q \to G}, so we must have the relation

\displaystyle  (q_1q_2)^h = (q_1^h)^{q_2^\alpha} (q_2^h).

This relation means that {h} is a crossed homomorphism from {Q} to {Z(N)}. The group of crossed homomorphisms {G \to M} is usually denoted {Z^1_\alpha(G, M)}. Thus we have a short exact sequence

\displaystyle  Z^1_\alpha(Q, Z(N)) \to I_{\alpha,\alpha} \to C_{\alpha,\alpha}.

In particular, if {N} is a characteristic subgroup of {N \rtimes_\alpha Q}, {I_{\alpha,\alpha}} is the full automorphism group, so we have a short exact sequence

\displaystyle  Z^1_\alpha(Q, Z(N)) \to \mathrm{Aut}(N \rtimes_\alpha Q) \to C_{\alpha,\alpha}.

In fact {C_{\alpha,\alpha}} can be identified with the subgroup of automorphisms of {N \rtimes_\alpha Q} preserving {Q}, so this sequence splits and we find that

\displaystyle  \mathrm{Aut}(N \rtimes_\alpha Q) \cong Z_\alpha^1(Q, Z(N)) \rtimes C_{\alpha,\alpha}.

Let us put all this into practice. Recall that we have two possibilities for {N}: {N \cong C_{253}} or {N \cong C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}}. Let us consider the case {N \cong C_{253}} first. We have

\displaystyle  \mathrm{Aut}(C_{253}) \cong \mathrm{Aut}(C_{23}) \times \mathrm{Aut}(C_{11}) \cong C_{22} \times C_{10} \cong C_2^2 \times C_5 \times C_{11}.

For each choice of {Q} among {C_8, C_4 \times C_2, C_2^3, D_4, Q_8} we must tabulate the homomorphisms {Q \to \mathrm{Aut}(C_{253})} up to the action of {\mathrm{Aut}(Q)} by precomposition and the conjugation action of {\mathrm{Aut}(C_{253})}. Since {\mathrm{Aut}(C_{253})} is abelian, the latter action is trivial. Any such homomorphism must take values in the Sylow {2}-subgroup {C_2^2}, so we are reduced to tabulating homomorphisms {Q \to C_2^2} up to automorphisms of {Q}.

Case {Q = C_8}: There are four. Among these are groups with the structures {C_{2024}}, {C_{23} \times (C_{11} \rtimes C_8)}, {C_{11} \times (C_{23} \rtimes C_8)}. The last has the structure {C_{253} \rtimes C_8}, and the action of {C_8} on {C_{253}} is fixed-point-free.

Case {Q = C_4 \times C_2}: Write {Q = \langle x, y \mid x^4 = y^2 = [x,y] = 1\rangle}. Any homomorphism {Q \to C_2^2} must kill {x^2}, so factors through {Q / \langle x^2 \rangle \cong \langle x, y \mid x^2 = y^2 = [x,y] = 1\rangle \cong C_2^2}. Naively are {4^2} homomorphisms {Q/\langle x^2\rangle \to C_2^2}, but {\mathrm{Aut}(Q)} acts by swapping {x} and {xy} (while {y} is fixed) and the number of orbits of homomorphisms {Q \to C_2^2} is {1 \cdot 4 + 3 \cdot 2 = 10}. These groups include {C_{253} \times C_4 \times C_2}, {(C_{253} \rtimes C_4) \times C_2}, {(C_{11} \rtimes C_4) \times C_{23} \times C_2}, {(C_{23} \rtimes C_4) \times C_{11} \times C_2}, {D_{253} \times C_4}, {D_{11} \times C_{23} \times C_4}, {D_{23} \times C_{11} \times C_4}, and {3} others.

Case {Q = C_2^3}: There are {4^3} homomorphisms {C_2^3 \to C_2^2}, but only {5} up to the action of {\mathrm{Aut}(Q) \cong \mathrm{GL}_3(2)}. They are in bijection with subgroups of {C_2^2}. The corresponding groups of order {2024} are {C_{23} \times C_{11} \times C_2^3}, {D_{11} \times C_{23} \times C_2^2}, {D_{23} \times C_{11} \times C_2^2}, {D_{253} \times C_2^2}, and {D_{11} \times D_{23} \times C_2}.

Case {Q = D_4}: Any homomorphism {D_4 \to C_2^2} factors through {D_4 / D_4' \cong C_2^2}. Just as in the case of {C_4 \times C_2} there are {10} homomorphisms {D_4 \to C_2^2} up to the action of {\mathrm{Aut}(D_4)}. The groups of order {2024} include {C_{253} \times D_4} and {9} in which {D_4} acts nontrivially on {C_{253}} by conjugation.

Case {Q = Q_8}: Any homomorphism {Q_8 \to C_2^2} factors through {Q_8 / Q_8' \cong C_2^2}. In this case {\mathrm{Aut}(Q_8)} acts on {C_2^2} as {S_3}, so as in the case of {C_2^3} there are just {5} homomorphisms {Q_8 \to C_2^2} up to automorphisms of {Q_8}. Thus there are {5} semidirect products of the form {C_{253} \rtimes Q_8}.

Now consider the case in which {N \cong C_{23} \rtimes_\alpha C_{11}} is nonabelian. Since {C_{23}} is a characteristic subgroup of {N} (being the only subgroup of order {23}), we have

\displaystyle  \mathrm{Aut}(C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}) \cong Z^1_\alpha(C_{11}, C_{23}) \rtimes C_{\alpha,\alpha},

where {C_{\alpha,\alpha}} is the subgroup of {\mathrm{Aut}(C_{23}) \times \mathrm{Aut}(C_{11})} consisting of compatible pairs. Consider the compatibility relation {\alpha f_1^\iota = f_2 \alpha}. Since {\mathrm{Aut}(C_{23}) \cong C_{22}} is abelian, {f_1^\iota} is trivial, so the relation reduces to {\alpha = f_2 \alpha}. Since {\alpha} is injective, this implies that {f_2} is trivial. Therefore {C_{\alpha,\alpha} = \mathrm{Aut}(C_{23}) \cong C_{22}}. Meanwhile one checks that {Z^1_\alpha(C_{11}, C_{23}) \cong C_{23}}. Therefore {\mathrm{Aut}(C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}) \cong C_{23} \rtimes C_{22}}. Now if {Q} has order {8} then any homomorphism {Q \to C_{23} \rtimes C_{22}} takes values in a Sylow {2}-subgroup isomorphic to {C_2}, which are all conjugate. Tabulating homomorphisms {Q \to \mathrm{Aut}(N)} up to the natural action of {\mathrm{Aut}(N) \times \mathrm{Aut}(Q)} is therefore equivalent to tabulating homomorphisms {Q \to C_2} up to automorphisms of {Q}, which just amounts to tabulating automorphism classes of subgroups of {Q} of index at most {2}. This case is therefore somewhat easier than the previous one.

Case {Q = C_8}: There are just two. The corresponding groups of order {2024} have the forms {(C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}) \times C_8} and {C_{23} \rtimes (C_{11} \times C_8)}.

Case {Q = C_4 \times C_2}: There are three, corresponding to subgroups isomorphic to {Q}, {C_4}, and {C_2 \times C_2}. The corresponding groups of order {2024} include {(C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}) \times C_4 \times C_2}, {(C_{23} \rtimes C_{22}) \times C_4}, {(C_{23} \rtimes C_{44}) \times C_2}.

Case {Q = C_2^3}: There are two, since all index-{2} subgroups are essentially the same. The corresponding groups of order {2024} are {(C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}) \times C_2^3} and {(C_{23} \rtimes C_22) \times C_2^2}.

Case {Q = D_4}: There are three, since there is a unique subgroup isomorphic to {C_4} while the two subgroups isomorphic to {C_2 \times C_2} are equivalent by an automorphism. There are three corresponding groups with structure {(C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}) \rtimes D_4}.

Case {Q = Q_8}: There are two, since the three subgroups of {Q_8} isomorphic to {C_4} are equivalent by automorphisms. Thus there are just two groups with the structure {(C_{23} \rtimes C_{11}) \rtimes Q_8}.

Thus altogether there are {34+12 = 46} groups of order {2024}.

One thought on “Groups of order 2024

Leave a comment