Daniele Garzoni and I have just uploaded to the arxiv our paper Random generation with cycle type restrictions. The motivating question for this project was: For which is it true that two random elements of
of order
almost surely generate at least
? This was known to be true for all bounded
by work of Liebeck and Shalev (the case
is immediately ruled out because any two elements of order
generate a dihedral group). On the other hand, it is easy to come up with large
, for example
for some prime
, for which almost surely two elements of order
have many common fixed points. It rapidly comes into focus that the critical thing is cycle type, so we decided to try to answer the following more general question: For which conjugacy classes
and
is it true that random elements
and
almost surely generate at least
?
As already indicated, it is critical that and
together have few fixed points, as otherwise (after one of them is replaced by a random conjugate) it is likely that
will have a fixed point. Specifically, we require that
is small compared to
, where
and
count the fixed points in
and
respectively. It turns out that
-cycles are also critical: if
and
count
-cycles, then we need
to be small compared to
. Indeed, if
and
are both comparable to
, then there is a positive probability that, after random conjugation,
and
will have a common
-cycle.
In fact, more is true. It was a surprise to us to discover that, if and
are both
(so that
and
are nearly of cycle type
) then in fact
is almost surely intransitive. To see this, let
be the number of orbits
of
of size
such that
and
both consist only of
-cycles, and let
be the sum of
as
ranges between
and
, say. Then
where is the probability that two random elements
, each of cycle type
, generate a transitive subgroup. It turns out that
, and hence using Stirling’s approximation we have
Hence if , then by the divergence of the harmonic series we have
. Combined with a second moment bound, this proves that
almost surely.
In our paper we give several other examples like this to indicate what the required hypotheses should be, and we prove the following theorem.
Theorem 1 Assume that
. Then
is at least
with probability
if and only if
;
is at least
with probability bounded away from
if and only if
and
.
The requirement that is technical, and a little unnatural. We could relax it a bit, but we do appear to need some a priori bound on
in order to have some such if-and-only-if theorem. For example, suppose
is an
-cycle and
is a transposition. Then
, so our “natural” hypotheses are trivially satisfied. After random conjugation we have, up to relabelling,
and
, where
is drawn uniformly from
. The group
is determined by
: if
then
is imprimitive, while if
then
. Hence
with probability exactly
, which can be small or large depending on the arithmetic of
.
In any case, armed with our theorem, we managed to answer our original question for a huge swathe of possible orders . Among other things, we proved that if
has any divisor
in the range
then indeed two random elements of order
will almost surely generate at least
. See our paper for some other positive results, as well as several more examples which limit what you can expect to be true.